SMART just isn’t smart enough

I am becoming more and more disillusioned with SMART target setting and the related ILP process. I think we need to consider if it’s fit for purpose. The notion is that specific, measurable, achievable, realistic targets will help learners focus on steps for learning. However, what I generally see in colleges and what I experienced in a 20-year teaching career, was that the target setting and related ILP process is too often reduced to a lengthy paper exercise in which many learners do not engage. Targets can be set by the teacher/tutor/assessor, in language that isn’t even student friendly in some cases. ILPs become another part of the monstrous paper trail of FE and only raise their head again on a stressful 1:1 review day.  It’s all rather reductive and not a great help in creating an ongoing dialogue about learning.

So I think we need to re-think SMART and put some attention on making targets:

  • Student friendly and stretching– in language that learners understand and use, with enough challenge to make them engaging and stimulating
  • Motivating- linked more clearly to how they connect with the wider learning process and ultimate goals for the individual in work and life
  • Actual and authentic– the kind of things that particular learners will be able to do in their current life, so better personalized, e.g. read and summarise one article from a free newspaper every week; get one piece of feedback from a client/customer/colleague every week and note down what you learned from it
  • Reviewed– in 1:1 tutorial discussions/learner reviews and in group activities, so that learners practise self and peer assessment using targets
  • Talked about– in sessions or workplace meetings, as part of lessons and on a regular basis, so that they are real, live parts of the learning process

If SMART targets and goals can be more like this, I think there is a chance they will assist learners to learn more effectively and be a good use of our time as teachers, tutors and assessors. However, for this to happen, some may need to re-think their approach, review their use of SMART targets and embed them much more actively and usefully into everyday practice. Then a real dialogue about learning would become possible.

This entry was posted in Apprenticeships/Workplace Learning, Assessment methods, Assessors, FE, Teaching and learning, Tutors and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to SMART just isn’t smart enough

  1. Pingback: Goal Setting Articles and Further Reading - Outstanding Progress

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s